CONSULTANT-GRADE AI DIAGNOSTICS

Get a consultant-grade AI diagnosis in 10 minutes.

Paste a prompt, SOP, workflow, or agent instruction. Get back a full diagnostic package — findings, corrected artifact, risk register, ownership map, and implementation plan. What a $400/hr consultant would charge you for — delivered in under 10 minutes. Start free, no sign-up required.

Most AI failures start before the answer — in the prompt, context, handoff, workflow, or approval path.

UNDER THE HOOD
Not a chatbot. A multi-model diagnostic engine.
Parallel analysis
Multiple specialized AI models examine your work simultaneously — not one after the other.
Cross-examination
Each model challenges the others’ findings. Blind spots get caught before they ever reach you.
Synthesized verdict
A synthesis layer resolves disagreements and locks in the strongest, most grounded diagnosis.
What you get isn’t a chatbot’s best guess. It’s a vetted, multi-perspective verdict — delivered in under 10 minutes.
Just here to write, fix, or audit prompts? We built Starter for that.
1
Diagnose the weak spots
We pinpoint what's vague, missing, or ambiguous — not just reword it.
2
Rebuild with structure
Add the roles, context, and acceptance criteria that make outputs reliable.
3
Score & version
Get a quality score and a saved version you can reuse and improve.
Prompt repair, auditing, and versioning — from $19.99/mo. No workflow complexity required.
Try an example:
Paste broken AI work. Get a diagnostic package.
2 free diagnostics remaining
3 free diagnostics No credit card required.
✓Diagnosis in seconds✓Prompts · SOPs · agents · ops✓No sign-up required
★★★★★“Saved my butt twice in two weeks.” — Mary, TryPromptFlow user
Free diagnosis · no sign-up · no credit card required. Paste a prompt below and see what changes.
See what's in the package →
One run. A complete diagnostic package.

What the diagnostic package
actually delivers.

One submission returns eight business-ready artifacts — not a paragraph of suggestions, a full diagnostic package your team can act on today.

Executive verdict
Go / Review / Hold — with the reasoning behind it
Findings table
Ranked issues with severity, root cause, and fix
Corrected artifact
Repaired prompt, SOP, workflow, or agent instruction
Risk register
What breaks, when, and what it costs if unresolved
Ownership map
Who owns each finding and who signs off
Implementation roadmap
Prioritized action plan with First 7 Days focus
KPI framework
How to measure whether the fix actually worked
Release confidence note
Operator acceptance tests and promotion criteria
3 free diagnostics · no credit card
Real report output · Workflow Doctor

Here's what you get — specific,
structural, ready to act on.

Generated from a real submission. No editing. This is exactly what the tool returns.

app.trypromptflow.com · Workflow Doctor
Diagnostic Packet
Target Operating Model
Corrected Procedure
Root Cause, Risks & Verification
System of Record
Workflow Acceptance Checks
Rollout Plan
Workflow Fix: Inbound Lead Routing: 2-Hour First-Touch SLA + Trial/ICP Priority Path

You do not have a lead-volume problem — you have a missing first-touch-gate problem: leads enter Salesforce with no owner, no deadline, and no segment, so a third of them silently rot. With 250–300 leads/month and 30–35% untouched at 7 days, that is roughly 75–105 leads per month getting zero contact (300 × 0.35 = 105) — and your highest-converting segment, trial PQLs, sits in that same undifferentiated queue. Lifting demo-booked from 8% to 15% on 300 leads is ~21 extra demos/month that the current queue structure is leaking before first contact.

Target Operating Model

Adopt the 'one-owner-one-deadline-at-submission' model, replacing the implicit 'shared-queue, whoever-gets-to-it' model. Every lead is assigned an SDR owner and a 2-business-hour first-touch deadline the moment it is created, trial and high-ICP leads are auto-routed to a same-day call path, and no lead can leave 'New' without a logged first touch and reason. The rubric you run in Google Sheets moves into Salesforce fields so routing is enforced by the system, not by memory.

Corrected Procedure
  1. Capture and enrich at submission — Salesforce creates the lead and triggers Clearbit; intake requires ICP score, trial flag, and enrichment fields. Status: New.
  2. Fail-closed validation gate — a Salesforce Validation Rule blocks exit from New unless those fields are populated; if missing or ambiguous, route to Triage with the unclear reason recorded.
  3. Segment-based assignment — Assignment Rules set the path: trial flag = true OR high-ICP → same-day call, priority P1. Scored non-trial → P2, HubSpot sequence. Conflict → Triage.
  4. Set the SLA timer — first_touch_due = creation + 2 business hours (9am–6pm EST, Mon–Fri). Single deadline. No exceptions.
↓ Root Cause · System of Record · Acceptance Checks · Rollout Plan
Fix Decision
Issue Type
workflow
Status
Action Required
Deliverable
Operating contract & SOP included
Readiness Score
76/ 100
Nearly Ready — address flagged items before scaling
Summary reflects this diagnosis only. Verify before acting.

Submit your workflow. Get the full report — Target Operating Model, corrected SOP, risk register, acceptance checks, and rollout plan.

3 free diagnostics · no credit card required
Side by side

Raw AI chat vs. TryPromptFlow

AI chat is fast. But it leaves most of the diagnostic work to you. TryPromptFlow structures the output so your team can act, not guess.

What you needRaw AI chatTryPromptFlow
Diagnosis & findingsSometimesAlways
Corrected deployable artifactInconsistentAlways
Risk registerRarelyAlways
Ownership / RACI matrixRarelyAlways
Implementation roadmapRarelyAlways
KPI frameworkRarelyAlways
Release confidence noteNeverAlways
Version historyNoYes
Evaluation runsNoYes

Before and after — mapped to the four tools

Each tool repairs a different layer of AI work, from a single prompt to the workflow around it.

PromptFlow
Before

Write some launch copy for our product that talks about the benefits and makes it exciting.

After

Write 3 launch headlines and one short paragraph for [product], aimed at [audience]. Lead with the top outcome, name one concrete proof point, keep a calm confident tone, and avoid hype words. Return it as a list I can paste.

Workflow Doctor
Before

After each sales call, the rep adds notes to the CRM and tries to capture next steps.

After

Within 2 hours of each call, the rep logs: (1) objections in the prospect's own words, (2) a confirmed next step with an owner and due date, (3) any timeline or urgency signal. Records missing a field are flagged as incomplete.

Agentic Workflow Doctor
Before

Support agent: answer the customer, look up their order, and issue a refund if it seems needed.

After

Findings: no refund cap, no human approval above a set amount, no check that the order belongs to the requester, no fallback when lookup fails. Repair targets: add an approval gate, an identity check, a refund limit, and an escalation path.

Workflow OS Doctor
Before

We want to launch an AI onboarding workflow next month across sales and support.

After

OS map: 6 steps, 3 owners, 2 unowned handoffs, 1 missing approval gate. Operating gaps: no monitoring, no rollback. Launch checklist: assign handoff owners, add an approval before send, set a review cadence, and define a fallback before go-live.

Examples are illustrative. Human review is still recommended before relying on AI output.

What users are saying

Feedback from people using TryPromptFlow in real work.

"I've been using TryPromptFlow for three weeks — everything from creating prompts to diagnosing workflows — and it saves me 2 to 4 hours a week fighting with outcomes."

— Frank
TryPromptFlow user

"TryPromptFlow has saved my butt twice already and I've only been using it for two weeks."

— Mary
TryPromptFlow user

"I was very hesitant to believe it could outperform my main AI, but I ran the comparisons — TryPromptFlow's results were 15 to 25% better depending on the specific question."

— George
TryPromptFlow user

Leave a review

Used TryPromptFlow? Share your experience. Reviews appear here once approved.

The alternative

What a consultant charges. What this costs.

Traditional diagnostic work can take hours of expert review. TryPromptFlow gives your team a structured first-pass diagnostic package in minutes — findings, corrected artifact, risk register, ownership map, roadmap, and KPI framework included.

$150–$400/hr
AI workflow consultant rate
4–8 hrs
Typical audit scope per problem
$600–$3,200
Cost of one consultant engagement
vs. consultant
< 10 min
TryPromptFlow diagnosis time
3 free diagnostics — no credit card required
Pricing

Simple monthly pricing with clear usage limits

For individuals and teams who need to diagnose, repair, version, and prove their AI prompts and workflow instructions are ready for real use.
Self-serve plans available. Enterprise plans available on review.
After your 3 free diagnostics: pick a plan below to keep going — or stop with no charge. No credit card required to start.
Free
Free
3 standard runs
No credit card required. 3 runs to see a real diagnosis on your own work. Upgrade anytime to keep going.
No credit card required
  • ✓See a real diagnosis on your own prompt or workflow
  • ✓No credit card — no commitment
  • ✓Your saved work carries over when you upgrade
Starter
$19.99
per month
50 prompt runs / month
For individuals building and refining prompts every month
  • ✓50 PromptFlow runs / month
  • ✓Full prompt engine, version history, and saved library
  • ✓PromptFlow only — no Workflow Doctor or Agentic audits
Core
$199
per month
50 standard runs / month
For teams running regular workflow diagnoses
  • ✓50 PromptFlow runs / month
  • ✓10 Workflow Doctor reviews / month
  • ✓5 Agentic Workflow Doctor audits / month
  • ✓Workspace management with owner, admin, and member roles
Most Popular
Growth
$399
per month
100 standard runs / month
For teams that need full workflow OS coverage
  • ✓100 PromptFlow runs / month
  • ✓25 Workflow Doctor reviews / month
  • ✓25 Agentic Workflow Doctor audits / month
  • ✓5 Workflow OS Doctor reviews / month
  • ✓Full Diagnosis (cross-lane root cause synthesis)
Need more than your included monthly usage? Additional usage can be added without changing plans.
What is a standard run?

A standard run is one normal use of TryPromptFlow to diagnose, repair, or evaluate a prompt or workflow instruction.

  • ·Diagnose a broken workflow step or unclear prompt
  • ·Generate a corrected procedure, checklist, or workflow instruction set
  • ·Run an evaluation against saved test cases
  • ·Compute promotion readiness for a candidate version

We use standard runs on the pricing page to keep usage simple and easy to understand.

Plan comparison
PlanMonthly pricePrompt runsWD reviewsAWD auditsWOS reviews
FreeFree3—Try it before subscribingSelf-serve
Starter$19.9950/mo—PromptFlow-only individualsSelf-serve
Core$19950/mo10 WD · 5 AWDRegular workflow diagnosesSelf-serve
Growth$399100/mo25 WD · 25 AWD · 5 WOSFull workflow OS + Full DiagnosisSelf-serve

Common questions

Is TryPromptFlow just a prompt generator?+
What should I use first?+
Do I need to be technical?+
How many free diagnostics do I get?+
Does TryPromptFlow guarantee better AI output?+
What are Trust Flags?+
What is a Repair Pack?+
Why does human review still matter?+
Who is this for?+